Organizational Relational Range Assessment

The RIF Relational Maturity Model™ | RE/Ignite and Thrive Coaching

This isn't a test of how "good" your organization is — it's a snapshot of its current range: how much capacity your policies, leadership, and culture have to see, hold, and choose in how they respond, especially under pressure or complexity. For each of the 15 scenarios, choose the response that's closest to how your organization actually tends to operate right now — not how you'd like it to.

0 of 15 answered

1. When our policies don't clearly cover a situation, our organization tends to…

Default to the strictest interpretation, or escalate everything upward, just to avoid risk. Notice the gap, even if we still default to caution. Discuss what the policy was actually meant to protect, before deciding. Use judgment aligned with our values, and document the reasoning. Adapt naturally within clear boundaries, trusting the people closest to the situation to decide well.

2. When a leader receives critical feedback from their team, our organization tends to…

Treat it as a problem to manage or contain quickly. Acknowledge it happened, even if little visibly changes as a result. Genuinely examine what's behind the feedback. Act on it deliberately and communicate what will change. Welcome it as useful information and adjust leadership behaviour in real time.

3. When a major change happens — restructuring, a new system, new leadership — our organization tends to…

Announce it and expect people to comply and keep up. Notice the disruption it causes, even if we don't address it directly. Try to understand its impact on people before rolling it out further. Plan the change deliberately, with input and support built in. Adjust the pace and approach based on how people are actually responding.

4. When someone makes a significant mistake, our organization tends to…

Look for who to blame. Notice the instinct to blame, even if it still happens somewhat. Examine what in the system or process contributed to it. Hold the person accountable while also addressing root causes. Treat it as useful information for the whole system to learn from and adapt.

5. When we have to make a decision without complete information, our organization tends to…

Delay or avoid deciding until we feel certain. Notice our discomfort with the uncertainty, even if it still slows us down. Weigh the options and trade-offs as best we can. Make a considered call and own the decision. Decide, stay responsive, and adjust course as more information comes in.

6. When an employee raises a concern about how things are being done, our organization tends to…

Treat it as a compliance issue or something to be managed carefully. Hear it, even if it doesn't visibly change anything. Genuinely explore what's behind the concern. Take it seriously and factor it into decisions going forward. Treat it as a normal, welcome part of an open, evolving system.

7. When training new leaders or managers, our organization tends to focus on…

Rules, procedures, and what not to do. Naming common pitfalls, even without much practice applying that awareness. Helping leaders examine their own patterns and assumptions. Building judgment, values-alignment, and decision-making skill. Developing adaptive capacity — the ability to read and respond to real situations as they unfold.

8. When departments or teams disagree about priorities, our organization tends to…

Let whoever has more authority or urgency win. Notice the tension, even if it isn't directly addressed. Try to understand what each side actually needs. Work through the trade-offs deliberately and communicate the decision. Adapt collaboratively as priorities shift, without it becoming a fixed turf battle.

9. When performance is reviewed, our organization tends to focus on…

Whether targets or checklists were hit. Naming areas for growth, even if development support is limited. Understanding the context behind performance, not just the outcome. Aligning growth conversations with both the person's development and organizational needs. An ongoing, responsive conversation rather than a fixed once-a-year event.

10. When something goes publicly wrong — a mistake, a complaint, a crisis — our organization tends to…

React quickly to control the narrative or contain the damage. Recognize the impact, even if the response still feels rushed. Take time to understand what actually happened and why. Respond with accountability and a clear, considered plan. Respond transparently and adapt the response as the situation develops.

11. When it comes to workload and capacity, our organization tends to…

Push through and expect people to absorb whatever comes up. Acknowledge people are stretched, even if little changes. Look at what's actually driving the overload. Make deliberate trade-offs about what gets prioritized or dropped. Adjust capacity and expectations fluidly as demands shift.

12. When it comes to differing perspectives and backgrounds across the organization, we tend to…

Treat it as a compliance requirement to satisfy. Acknowledge its importance, even if practices haven't caught up. Actively examine where our practices fall short. Build differing perspectives into how decisions actually get made. Draw on that range naturally, as a genuine source of strength.

13. When values and short-term results come into tension, our organization tends to…

Prioritize the short-term result and deal with the fallout later. Notice the tension, even if the result usually still wins. Weigh what's actually at stake on both sides. Make a deliberate call that reflects our stated values. Hold both without needing to sacrifice one for the other, adapting case by case.

14. When someone asks for support — workload, mental health, personal circumstances — our organization tends to…

Handle it informally, case by case, often depending on who's asked. Recognize the need, even if support is inconsistent. Consider what kind of support would genuinely help. Offer clear, consistent pathways for support. Respond flexibly to what the person actually needs, within a supportive structure.

15. When something is working really well, our organization tends to…

Not pay much attention to it — focus stays on what's broken. Notice it's working, without examining why. Try to understand what's contributing to the success. Deliberately reinforce and build on what's working. Naturally sustain and extend it as conditions change.

Please answer all 15 scenarios to see your result.

Almost there — where should we send your results?

Enter your email to unlock your organization's Relational Range and see the dominant stage.

Your organization's current dominant stage

—

Your Range Across All Five Stages

Organizational relational maturity isn't a fixed rank — it's range: how much capacity your policies, leadership, and culture have to see, hold, and choose as conditions change. An organization can be highly capable in some areas (like decision-making) and far more reactive in others (like handling mistakes or workload) — and any organization can slip into reactive patterns under enough pressure. What matters is how quickly the system notices, recovers, and reorients. The breakdown below shows where your responses landed across all five stages.

Book a Call with Julia See the Full 25-Question Audit

Julia Huckle

Highly skilled executive and leadership coach with a passion for partnering with people to reach their goals and thrive. Creator of the Relational Intelligence Framework™.

Organizational Relational Range Assessment

Almost there — where should we send your results?

—

Explore

Connect